Logistics capacity management – A theoretical review and applications to .. According to Günther and Tempelmeier production can be defined as “the generation Günther, H.-O., Tempelmeier, H. (): Produktion und Logistik, Springer: Berlin . URL: mmoonneeyy.info, date , Günther and conceptual framework Concurrent Design Attribute .. We hope that our  Günther H.O. & Tempelmeier H., , Produktion and Logistik . Vieweg, Braunschweig et al., pp Grunow M, Günther H-O, Viergutz B ( ) Günther H-O, Tempelmeier H () Produktion und Logistik, 4th edn. et al., mmoonneeyy.info
|Language:||English, Spanish, Hindi|
|ePub File Size:||19.77 MB|
|PDF File Size:||16.61 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
𝗣𝗗𝗙 | On Jan 1, , Horst Tempelmeier and others published Günther, H.-O. und H. Tempelmeier, Produktion und Logistik - Supply Chain. Download Horst Tempelmeier pdf ebooks , Hans-Otto Günther, Horst Tempelmeier · Produktion und Logistik Auflage, , German, 0 b, pdf, GET. See details and download book: Ebooks Free Download Fb2 Produktion Und Logistik Pdf By Horst Tempelmeier Hans Otto Günther.
Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. A total of 33 papers were found to be directly related Based on our CDA-TOP framework, the implications to the review scope and were selected for further of design trade-off asymmetry can be explained using analysis. More importantly, design trade-off asymmetry when one of the this trade-off boundary not only marks both the coupled abovementioned trade-off scenarios occurs see dotted region at architectural and detailed levels, but also the lines in Figure 1. Our focus is on the design trade- [12, 29, ]. Das Buch behandelt Fragen des strategischen Produktionsmanagements, die Gestaltung der Infrastruktur des Produktionssystems, die operative Produktionsplanung und -steuerung sowie logistische Prozesse, Supply Chain Management und Advanced Planning Systems. As explained in the two paper goes beyond these four papers by including the aforementioned conceptual examples, the coupling analysis of the interdependence between PD and SC between attributes weakens across hierarchical levels attributes and of the CP-SCD trade-off methodologies.
In contrast, SC management is a comparatively new trade-off is possible.
This requires criteria to be research domain that emerged from the fields of commensurable. For non-compensatory types, trade-off management science such as operations research during is not possible due to lack of direct commensurability. Despite its head start, PD Guitouni and Martel  state the need for aggregation remains a combination of art and science as its sub- of criteria in decision trade-off. Aggregation allows disciplines are not always quantifiable or intuitive .
In the context of our review, review of PD methodologies and theories. These product levels criteria and constraints using commensuration, enable a systematic top-down approach in PD. Among compensation and aggregation. Ground-breaking research be used to support trade-off analysis. Simulation is not a using architectural attributes such as modularity and trade-off methodology per se but can be used with other commonality [e.
SCD has been recognized by leading operations management researchers much later e. Useful for the purposes of mapping and linking key relationships and interactions our research are the SCD frameworks using multi- between PD and SC attributes, we developed the echelon attributes.
Simchi-Levi et al.
Meyr and Stadtler  features: We employ multi-layer attribute hierarchy as such structures have often been used as an effective way CDA-TOP has been created to be conceptually useful to represent attributes in trade-off studies , PD [12, to product and SC designers. CDA- At the upstream PD process and SCD strategic level, TOP is shown as a symmetrical pyramid with balanced architectural attributes determine the arrangement and design attributes in product and SC domains for configuration of the product e.
In reality, this symmetry rarely e. This is in-line with .
However, we and SC architects by highlighting that architectural believe that such industrial practices of asymmetrical design can begin concurrently without waiting for trade-off are sub-optimal as they are a result of detailed designs of the other side. More importantly, design trade-off asymmetry when one of the this trade-off boundary not only marks both the coupled abovementioned trade-off scenarios occurs see dotted region at architectural and detailed levels, but also the lines in Figure 1.
In the event of design trade-off decoupled region at dynamic level. For example, a change criterion for inclusion in our literature review is the of the automotive SC make-buy architecture will impact presence of design concurrency and a trade-off the product modular architecture e.
This also means that the design attributes used material product detail , which may have an impact on in the literature must possess the elements of maximum speed due to material weight change product commensurability, compensation and aggregation.
With dynamic. Conversely, a change of the product modular this specific scope in mind, we conducted a search in architecture e.
We replenishment policy SC detailed and the lead time SC have also noted the large body of literature in the field of dynamic. Such dominating influences of upstream product lifecycle design PLCD. Our focus is on the design trade- [12, 29, ].
Hence, papers concerning always a direct interdependence between product and SC PLCD are reviewed only if they fall into this category. CP-SCD research — a underexplored and emerging replenishment policy, choice of material and hardly any research area direct relationship between dynamic attributes e.
A total of 33 papers were found to be directly related Based on our CDA-TOP framework, the implications to the review scope and were selected for further of design trade-off asymmetry can be explained using analysis. Among these, only 17 papers were found to the concepts of trade-off leverage and quality.
First, we fulfil the criteria of our scope i. CP-SCD with trade- argue that design trade-off should be pursued at off methodology. The remaining 16 papers are of architectural level first before other levels to ensure qualitative type e. Second, we argue that symmetrical architectural applications in real industrial cases. Among these 16 design trade-off should be pursued to ensure higher qualitative papers, four are of literature review type.
Our trade-off quality.
As explained in the two paper goes beyond these four papers by including the aforementioned conceptual examples, the coupling analysis of the interdependence between PD and SC between attributes weakens across hierarchical levels attributes and of the CP-SCD trade-off methodologies.
Product architectural-SC detailed due to the need Furthermore, our paper has a more focused review scope for cross-hierarchical abstraction in the trade-off model. Most of the following: SCD attributes used in the reviewed papers reveals some interesting insights. First, the number of PD 10 types 2. Literature review scope and methodology and SC 12 types attributes used in reviewed papers are comparable.
Second, Table 1 shows that the PD 2. Scope and methodology attributes used in these papers are mostly product architectural types 24 out of 40, e. One explanation such that it addresses specifically the cross-disciplinary is that product architectural design attributes have research boundary between PD and SCD.
Also the difficulty in modelling the simulation over other types of MCDA methodologies. AHP or scoring are only suitable for architectural attributes. Only two papers use solely PD selecting discrete design options and not suitable for detailed attributes with SC attributes [3, 26]. Discretisation of In contrast, the SC attributes used are mostly of continuous attributes by ranking or scoring is required detailed type 48 out of Only 7 out of 17 papers use for aggregation, which can be unwieldy if there is large SC architectural attributes.
This comes as no surprise as number of attributes with complex relationships. This small Huang et al. Jiang et al. Conclusion by addressing the hierarchical levels systematically one after the other. CP-SCD trade-off methodologies classifying different types of design attributes.
In addition, we highlight design trade-off asymmetries and In section 1. From our MCDA methodologies. These papers use MOP-type e. Interestingly, other types of deserves a closer look. When should concurrent design MCDA have not been used. We have also found four really begin? Only one  of the 17 reviewed papers papers that use simulation [3, , 40]. We believe compares between sequential and simultaneous CP-SCD that the complex relationships of trade-off attributes and processes.
Third, ways to consider non-greenfield SCD the ease of quantifying certain target objectives e. For example,  Graves S. Normally, Here you can download '. Click on download link below to download the '. If no results, Please search Horst Tempelmeier here Again. Download type: Resumed dl with original filename Resumed dl with translit filename Resumed dl with md5 filename Open file in browser Results per page 25 50 View results: Simple Detailed Search for a phrase: Author s.
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Physica-Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaft 6 Lieferzeit-orientierte Lagerungs- und Auslieferungsplanung [1 ed. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.
Modelle und Algorithmen fur die Produktionsplanung und -steuerung in Advanced Planning-Systemen, 6th edition [6. Professor Dr. Hans-Otto Gunther , Professor Dr.
Horst Tempelmeier auth.